Evaluation criteria
Evaluation criteria
The evaluation will be executed base on the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries Notification 2015-201 (Dec. 24, 2015) 'Guidance on Class 1 Hinterland Management'. The full mark of the evaluation is 100 and the mark and the additional points of a applicant will be added up. The preferred bidders will be selected in the order of the total marks.
Evaluation item and score
Evaluation Items | Evaluation Standards | Points | |
---|---|---|---|
Total | 100 | ||
Additional points (Additional points can be applied repeatedly up to 5 points at max) |
○ For foreign investment company (including a foreign investment company to be established) * Foreign company shares : 50% or more(+1) 65% or more(+2) 80% or more(+3) |
+(3) | |
○ For domestic manufacturing company (Percentage of export turnover for 365 continuous days within 3 years from the selection notice) * Additional points for percentage of export turnover share 50% or more(+1) 65% or more(+2) 80% or more(+3) |
+(3) | ||
○ Integrated logistics companies certified by Article 38 of 'Framework act on logistics policies' (+1) ○ Logistics and warehousing companies certified as 'Exemplary Business Entities' by Article 21(3) of 'Act on the development and management of logistics facilities' (+1) |
+(2) | ||
○ Korean off-shore enterprises in repatriation (+2) * Limited to the enterprises corresponding to Article 2(4) Na of 'Act on Assistance to Korean off-shore enterprises in repatriation' |
+(2) | ||
○ Companies holding on a MOU with Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries of Korea, port authorities of Korea or central or local government bodies of Korea before the selection notice. (+3) * Only the MOU which has been pre-discussed with Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea is eligible for the additional points |
+(3) | ||
○ For consortiums Below additional points will be applied according to the proportion of participating companies - Additional points for export manufacturing companies - Additional points for certified integrated logistics companies and logistics and warehousing companies certified as Exemplary Business Entities |
|||
Business Capability(10) | ○ Adequacy of composition of a applicant | 5 | |
○ Financial status of applicant (Full marks for the above the average ration of the same category of industry) - Ordinary income to total asset, debt ratio, current ratio, interest coverage ratio - For foreign firms, domestic industrial average ratios will be applied |
5 | ||
Subtotal | 10 | ||
Business and operation plan(60) | ○ Business plan(25) | ○ Business vision and objectives - Clarity & feasibility of vision and objectives |
3 |
○ Expertise on the business - Assessment on the certificates and possession of advanced logistics business |
3 | ||
○ Organization and management/operation plan | 2 | ||
○ Employment and employment creation plan - Employment plan (qualitative assessment on the concreteness and feasibility of employment plan in comparison with similar industrial sector)(5) - Employment creation effect (5) |
10 | ||
○ Added value generation plan A mark [(1(D), 2(C), 3(B), 4(A) or 5(S)] will be granted base on added value generation level of Appendix 2 |
5 | ||
○ Estimated financial statement | 2 | ||
Subtotal | 25 | ||
Cargo attraction(generation) plan(35) |
○ Volume of cargo (feasibility of cargo attraction plan) Only cargo with evidence would be counted to assess (The volume of the cargo should be clearly stated on the evidence) * For manufacturers, cargo attraction plan means contain the import plan for raw materials and the export plan for finished/semi-finished goods. |
20 | |
○ Cargo generation business model and its validity (To assess feasibility and etc.) * For manufacturers, the appropriateness and feasibility of maritime transportation plan for raw materials import and export of the goods through the port. |
10 | ||
○ The portion of foreign cargo * 1 point for 20% or more, 2 points for 40% or more, 3 points for 60% or more, 4 points for 80% or more, 5 points for 100% |
5 | ||
Subtotal | 35 | ||
Investment and investment capital financing plan | ○ Adequacy of the facility size and the amount of investment - Adequacy of the bottom area and floor area of facility taking into account the leased land area - Adequacy of the investment amount taking into account the size of facility to be constructed (logistics facilities, investment on equipment, etc.) |
5 | |
○ Capital financing plan (size and trustworthiness) - Adequacy of equity investment (8) (5 points for 25% or more, 7 points for 30% or more, 8 points for 35% or more) - The amount of foreign investment and its share ratio (6) - The credibility of debt delivery plan (evidence required) (6) |
20 | ||
Subtotal | 25 | ||
Construction plan(5) | ○ Adequacy of the land utilization and facility construction plan | 3 | |
○ Adequacy of construction schedule (date of construction commencement) and facility maintenance plan | 2 | ||
Subtotal | 5 |